For those men and women who are not serious about having family and children, must be able to enjoy most of the benefits of family life sans the kids.. Such people should be paid carbon credits for abstaining from procreation. This will go a long way in reducing population, saving the Earth and at the same time remove money problems of many many people. However, the Governments must do much contemplation and surveys before implementing this to avoid social problems on account of this.

I have this thought that population and development is mainly responsible for emissions, if we go into the fundamentals. It is because a human being is born and he consumes world resources for nearly a century, that the world gets polluted. The birth of humans must be controlled, not through coarsion, but by providing incentives to those who produce no child.

Most persons do not produce children deliberately for bringing up a home. Many in the conservative society cannot get opportunities for sex without getting into marriage. Besides, their social security like being taken care of in the old age is also attached to marriage and kids. This leads them to marriage and eventually results in population increase.

My proposal is to discourage people from getting married for sex and social security. Only if a person really needs a family life with kids and is capable of bringing up kids should enter into marriage and home making.

Provide opportunities for sex amply through liberalising of social regulations and also provide social security to individuals by government providing support for the old citizens until their death. I clearly mean that individuals should get opportunity for living in the society enjoying romance and love and sex and feels safe being taken care of during illness. This will drive away a lot of people from producing children. The population reduction thus achieved goes a long way in emission control.

Carbon credits must be given to those individuals who choose not to marry and produced children. The amount will be sufficient to provide him a comfortable living and security in life.

The amount a person receive will be huge because if the value of carbon produced as a result of consumption by an individual would be huge. Assuming that a person produce 2 kids and after 20-25 years they produce still more like a chain reaction, the amount of fuel that is burned to support these individuals is huge.

A person without child, undergoing vasectomy and tubectomy must get carbon credits. International community must step in to dissuade individuals from producing more kids. By providing incentives to bachelors and spinsters this can be achieved. The main incentive is to compensate to them all the benefits they receive through marriage if they dont get married.

Since I am not able to access any authentic studies in this regard, I believe that, in more than 90 percent cases, human beings enter into sex instinctively to enjoy the pleasures, rather than producing a child. Married couple enters into sex and if the female become pregnant it is considered desirable. The couples expect such an outcome. Most of the traditional societies expect the newly married couple to procreate at the earliest. But it is not so in the modern fast life. Even after marriage the women do not want children immediately and want to postpone getting pregnant. They do so in order to prolong the courtship and romantic pleasures with the newly wedded partner. Women and men entering into sex without marriage, in almost 100 percent cases, do not want a child to be born as a result of their sexual acts. They may go for abortion in case of pre marital carriage. Demand for contraceptive measures is on the rise – an indicator showing that people do not want to procreate but want sex.

Sex is a biological need, just like need for urination and defecation. However, religions try to attach more value for sex, considering it as a sin, if done before marriage. Religions consider sex as a method invented by God for procreation and that the urge for sex need to be controlled unless for procreation, which is sanctioned for married couples only. This has some useful effects, since celibacy and lack of opportunities for sex controlled the world population. However, the strict moral codes created miseries for many people who faced lack of opportunities for sex and non availability of a suitable partner.

My theory is that world population can be controlled only through social engineering in which birth of children through procreative sex, that is sexual acts that are intended to produce children, only be supported or promoted and unintentional child births need to be curtailed.

This can be done through:-

1. A scientific solution that makes adults by default non productive so that any acts of sex would not lead to child birth unless the couples change the settings intentionally for procreative purpose.

2. Prevention of unintentional child birth

3. Permitting sex unlimited that are purely recreative

4. Providing social and economic security to those who abstain from procreation

Item No.1 and 2 above helps the youth to overcome miseries associated with unwanted pregnancies and permit them to enjoy life. The present situation is that a majority of girls and boys abstain from basic interaction because of restrictions imposed on them for avoiding unwanted pregnancies.

Item No.2 ensures that only wanted children are born. When parents are prepared emotionally, economically and socially let the child birth take place. But without these, it is miseries to both parents and the child.

Item No.3 is intended to delink the acts of sex from other factors like marriage and romance. Those who need sex as a solution to biological needs need to be given opportunities to do so without disturbing the general social interests. Anti privacy laws are essential to stop the state and the people from interfereing in the private affairs of couples are essential. The purpose is to prevent people from entering into marriage for the purpose of recreational sex. Only those who wish they should have a married life and are ready to be dutiful parents need to enter into marriage for procreative sex.

Item no 4  helps people from considering children as a solution to their economic and social needs. Many people marry and produce kids, fearing that if they do not do so, in their old age there will be no one to take care of them. The State ensures that the people are taken care of well in their old age by social servants and at State’s expense, thus diverting them from entering into marriage for procreation purpose.

A happy world requires people to be liberated from miseries, emotional as well as other.

The quality of life is also coming down with increasing pollution.

Food shortage and starvation still afflict millions of people.

Why should people be born if there is not enough to live happily?

Many are even committing suicide, after having fed up with life on earth.

Human miseries should not be allowed to increase . Unwanted births should be controlled.

Anyone can produce a child. It requires much skill to make anything out of materials. But without knowing anything at all one can produce a child. It is the easiest thing to produce on earth.. a human child. And the child may live for three quarter of a century. It requires just a matter of few minutes to produce a child. but it consumes resources for decades.

This ease of child production is what is risky. Unwanted children; Only if one can provide enough food, health facilities, security and education to a child he should be allowed to produce.  Otherwise he is committing a great sin-by bringing another human being amidst shortcomings and starvation..

The opposition has been accusing Shashi and Sunanda as if this amount is some illegitimate income invested stealthy on IPL shares by Shashi with Sunanda as binami. However, i gathered that such an amount is not invested and it is only an amount that would be raised later on. No reports have probed accurately into the financial dealing that took place. Neither did Tharoor and Sunanda cleared the doubts explicitly. I do not believe that Tharoor has done any corruption and his only fault was his impetuous, politically immature mannerisms and overconfidence that, if he has not done anything wrong. he need not hide from the media.

I think he is innocent and he is a victim of malicious intentions of Modi and the north indian racial superiority and envy that a south indian need not be so smart.

Khap Panchayats should not be allowed to run a parallel law here. They have grossly violated human rights of young couples and have involved in criminal acts of murder. There is no justification in their deeds and they deserve severe punishment for their crime.

However, I too believe that Hindu Marriage Act should be amended. But for not the same reasons that Khaps raise. I have many other concerns, connected with human rights, privacy and social security of individuals.
The word ‘Hindu’ stands for ‘Miscellaneous’ religion. Other than the major religions like christianity, sikhism, islam, buddhism etc. there are umpteen different communities in India following radically different practices, wide number of Gods, social customs, and beliefs. They are clubbed together as ‘Hindu’. There are temples in India that consider meat and animal sacrifice as sacrilege and at the same time there are Hindus who perform animal sacrifice in temples. There are Hindus who consider eating Beef as the worst thing and there are Hindus who eat beef. All these dissimilar communities are brought under the ambit of ‘Hindu’. This is unjustified.

Hindu Marriage Law is not doing justice to many sections within the Hindus and also does not represent the traditional practices of many communities within its fold. By coining the word ‘Hindu’ and making a Law according to christian and muslim moralities and practices has been fooling those who are clubbed under the word Hindu. For example polygamy is permissible for muslims and not permitted for the Hindus. But polygamy was a practice from time immemmorial in this country among hindus too. Even polyandry was practiced. Now new form of lifestyles like polyamory is also coming up. Hindu Marriage Act is very orthodox and inflexible to the needs of individuals and is against human right to association with opposite gender.

Besides,

Marriage is not a child’s play. Simply because it leads to the birth of children. It is not safe for a boy or a girl to enter into marriage and produce kids because the kid’s needs ans security will not be met. just a father and mother alone does not give adequate emotional or social support to children; they need grantparents and relatives to continue to live in the society. When a boy and a girl decides to get married without the support of relatives, they are not foreseeing what is ahead. An unfortunate incident, death or debilitating disease, for one or both parents will leave the children without anyone to support.

However, a boy and a girl in India must have the right to satisfy their emotional needs like love and love-making. But without adequate income and social security starting of family is very very risky for them. This they will realise only after the heat of the love settles down.. may be after their desires are satisfied. But by then they would have been totally cut off